Skip to main content

Standardize the Platform, Not the Solution -- Assimilation is Futile

Many organizations are plagued by incompatible software solutions that proliferate in multiple departments.  These solutions are expensive to support because they may require different skills from developers and system administrators. The quality of data also suffers because records are updated in one department and not another. The result is a search for a single system that will rule them all.

If this sounds familiar, it is because the desire for a monolithic and comprehensive software solution is timeless and universal.    The problem is that this quest is futile, and has been shown repeatedly to fail by large and small organizations.

Politics is usually the reason that a universal solution fails, not technology.   Individual departments know their data much better than anyone else, and are justifiably reluctant to give up control.

Change is also the archenemy of the monolithic solution.  It takes time to document and implement requirements, and these business needs are subject to change.  A fast cycle for implementing changes is a valuable asset for any organization.

Does the quixotic nature of universal solutions mean that no standardization can succeed?  No, it turns out that some standards can help you save time in procurement, development, testing and training.  The most important standard is to set a technology platform to encourage compatible solutions for your departments.

The best items to standardize are:
  1. The database. The database is the heart of most solutions. Supporting multiple databases will drive up software and integration costs.  
  2. Workflow engine. If an enterprise can standardize on workflows across departments, many headaches are eliminated.
  3. Services layer for user interfaces. Multiple interfaces are required, especially for mobile apps, so a standardized approach will save time. The Model View Controller (MVC) architecture decouples the user interface from the data and business rules for better performance and flexibility.
This standardized approach will require less expensive integration efforts, allowing more resources to be spent on customizing the workflows and user experience for your unique business needs.

Popular posts from this blog

Key Concepts for Microsoft Dynamics 365: Tenant, Instance, App and Solution

To understand Microsoft Dynamics 365 (formerly Dynamics CRM), you need to learn some new terms and concepts that may be a bit different from what you know from databases and solutions that are hosted on premises. This post introduces some of the key terms and how these concepts are important for planning your implementation. While Dynamics 365 is available on premises, it is most commonly deployed on the Microsoft cloud.  This blog post discusses only cloud implementations. Microsoft has multiple clouds such as commercial and government community clouds. We start with a Microsoft tenant .  A tenant is the account you create in the Microsoft Online Services environment (such as Office 365) when you sign up for a subscription. A tenant contains uniquely identified domains, users, security groups, and subscriptions.  Your tenant has a domain name of .onmicrosoft.com such as acme.onmicrosoft.com.  User accounts belong to a tenant, and subscriptions are assigned to user accoun

Understanding Dynamics 365 and Office 365 Admin Roles

Managing Dynamics 365 instances If you run Microsoft Dynamics 365 (formerly Dynamics CRM) in the Microsoft cloud, you need to understand how your Dynamics instances relate to Office 365 and choose which of your administrators receives which roles and permissions to manage Dynamics 365. In on premises deployments, your network administrator would create and delete user accounts.  The Dynamics 365 admin would then assign permissions to users in Dynamics 365. This post explains three administrator roles: Office 365 Global Administrator Dynamics 365 System Administrator Dynamics 365 Service Administrator You may think that the Dynamics 365 system administrator would have power to do all the actions needed to manage Dynamics 365, but this is not the case. What's different in Microsoft cloud deployments is that licenses and user accounts are managed in Office 365 by an Office 365 Global Administrator.  This role is analogous to a network administrator for an on premises

Replacing Microsoft InfoPath with Power Apps

Source:  https://powerapps.microsoft.com/en-us/infopath/ by James Townsend Microsoft has offered a number of forms automation products over the years, and the most long running was InfoPath which was released as part of Office 2003.  InfoPath is a powerful and flexible product that stores user data in XML while offering form features such as rules, data validation, scripting, and integration with SharePoint.  The popularity of SharePoint resulted in many organizations standardizing on InfoPath for forms, especially internal forms which are hosted on an intranet such as employee reviews, leave and payment requests, and human resources forms. Microsoft has discontinued InfoPath, with mainstream support ending July 13th, 2021, and extended support ending July 14th, 2026. Microsoft has named Power Apps as the successor to InfoPath .  Power Apps has much in common with InfoPath.  Both products include integration with SharePoint.  Both are geared toward the citizen developer and do