Skip to main content

Don't Call People Resources

I know that in project management, people are considered resources in the same way that raw materials are considered resources, but for software development projects I have found it counterproductive to treat people like so many interchangeable parts.

The success of a software project hinges on the interactions among many people, including the client, subject matter experts, project managers, testers, trainers and developers.  In addition to their experience and expertise, these people bring with them their personalities and communications styles. 

Because software development is more a team exercise, like filming a movie, than an individual exercise, like writing a book, the overall team dynamic is just as important as individual qualifications.   It is quite possible to put together a team of people with excellent resumes who will be quite ineffective when forced to work with one another.

I have run into clients who focus excessively on comparing resumes as if they provide an indication of future success.   Some of the best resumes I have seen belong to work avoiders who spend more time finding others to blame than accepting responsibility and getting things done.  Job hoppers have more interesting resumes than steady performers that stay with companies and projects for the long haul.

So many project methodologies are now used that you need to ensure everyone is on the same page.   Approaches and activities that work in one methodology are disastrous for others.  Excessive love of methodology and documentation over working software is ever more pernicious.

Experience of people who have worked as a team is a great asset for a software project.   Knowing the strengths and weaknesses of team members helps project managers and technical leads assign tasks to the right people, and to know how those people should be managed.   Some need close attention with frequent interaction, and others need time alone to do their work.  Some people will thrive in the intense pressure of a war room environment, while others will crumble.

So even if you call them resources on your project plan, don't treat people like resources if you want your project to succeed.

Popular posts from this blog

The DATA Act Driving Grant Management Automation

The Digital Accountability and Transparency Act enacted in May 2014 calls for making spending data available in open, standardized formats to be published online.  It is a continuation of transparency initiatives and lessons learned with experiences such as grants.gov, the 2009 economic stimulus under the Recovery Act and the spending site USASpending.gov.

Government grantees will have significant new administrative responsibilities.  Many organizations that were tracking grants in spreadsheets or documents will have to adopt more sophisticated automated grant management systems such as Microsoft Grants Manager to keep up with reporting rules.

For profit companies will lose some privacy as a result of this law.  Grant recipients will be required to disclose information including officer salaries.

Continued improvements to publishing grant opportunities such as grants.gov may make it easier to find grants. These reforms together are designed to improve the effectiveness of grant prog…

Dynamics 365 for Government Contractors (GovCon) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

One of InfoStrat's most popular solutions is Dynamics 365 for Government Contractors (GovCon).



Here are some answers to frequently asked question on this solution:
Can I add new fields to the solution?  -- Yes, the solution is fully customizable and you can add your own new fields to any form, view or report.Does Dynamics 365 for GovCon work on mobile devices?  -- Yes, Microsoft offers mobile apps for all the most popular platforms including iPhone, iPad, and Android phone and tablets.Does Dynamics 365 connect with bid data systems such as Deltek and Onvia?  -- Some information services, such as Onvia, offer integration with Dynamics 365.  Others require third party solutions such as the InfoStrat integration with Deltek GovWin IQ.What do customers typically customize for their unique requirements? -- Not all contractors follow the same steps in the capture process.  Most clients will tailor the business process to add or remove steps in order to match their sales methodology.  Of…

Getting the Most from Dynamics CRM Online -- Synchronous v Asynchronous Workflows

This video shows highlights from the InfoStrat March 2015 seminar "Getting the Most Out of Dynamics CRM Online" presented by Dmitri Riz, the leader of the InfoStrat Dynamics CRM practice.  This is the second part of a series of blog posts.  The first is Benefits and Cloud Thinking.



In order to make your CRM workflows perform best, you need to understand the difference between synchronous and asynchronous workflows so you can choose which is appropriate for your applications.



Synchronous workflows are a new feature that was introduced in Dynamics CRM 2013.  Unlike asynchronous workflows which are sent to a queue, synchronous workflows execute in a single transaction. 

This means you can eliminate the need for many plug-ins which were created for previous versions of Dynamics CRM.

You may want to disable synchronous workflows during import operations, because they will could be triggered by each new record and significantly slow down the import process.